Animal Birth Control programmes are supposed to solve two problems at once.
They are meant to humanely reduce the number of free-roaming dogs over time while ensuring that every dog passing through the system is vaccinated against rabies.
That makes ABC both an animal-welfare intervention and a public-health programme.
A recent investigation into centres in Puducherry and Tamil Nadu raises a disturbing question: what happens when sterilisation numbers become more important than the condition in which dogs leave the centre?
At the centre of the controversy is an ABC facility at Mettupalayam under Oulgaret Municipality in Puducherry.
An internal municipal dossier cited in a September 2026 investigation reportedly documented an episode in late 2025 in which 50 emaciated dogs were released from the centre, 20 dog deaths were recorded, and 50 complaints were made against the veterinarian working there.
The centre was being operated by the Hyderabad-based Vet Society for Animal Welfare and Rural Development, according to the report.
These are serious allegations reported through the dossier and subsequent investigation, not criminal guilt established by a court. But they are difficult to dismiss as an isolated incident.
Dogs allegedly came out “skin and bones”
Animal-welfare activist G. Ashok Raj, described in the investigation as an honorary member of the Animal Welfare Board of India, alleged that dogs were hurriedly released shortly before an inspection.
He said the animals appeared severely underweight and that some had deteriorating surgical sutures.
The investigation reported that community caregivers saw dogs die after release and that there were suspicions that the animals had been inadequately fed for an extended period.
Oulgaret Municipality’s own website confirms an Animal Birth Control and Anti-Rabies Vaccination programme at the Mettupalayam centre. Tender documents say the service should include catching, sterilisation, vaccination, deworming, feeding, post-operative care and release in good health.
The gap between that contract and the allegations on the ground is central to the controversy.
When Dog Sterilisation Turns Deadly: Inside the Puducherry ABC Crisis
Tamil Nadu’s government-fixed rate for ABC work has been ₹1,650 per dog, including ₹200 for catching and admission and ₹1,450 for sterilisation and associated care.
The number itself is not evidence of wrongdoing.
The problem lies in how a per-animal payment system can behave when verification is weak.
If payment is linked primarily to dogs reported as processed, it can create pressure to move animals through facilities quickly.
Separate reports from Chennai have documented allegations of already ear-notched dogs and lactating females being taken to ABC centres.
The deeper issue is whether authorities verify which dog was caught, whether surgery was required, whether vaccination was administered, whether recovery care was adequate, and whether the animal was released healthy at the correct location.
The rules already require detailed verification
India’s Animal Birth Control Rules, 2023 are far more detailed than the chaotic picture emerging from some centres might suggest.
Local authorities are responsible for ensuring adequate kennels, veterinary facilities, transport and appropriate infrastructure.
The rules also require local ABC monitoring committees, while AWBI guidance calls for detailed records covering capture, treatment, feeding, vaccines, mortality, staff, vehicles and CCTV footage.
The regulatory architecture already recognises that sterilisation counts alone are not enough. A functioning ABC programme should be auditable from capture to release.
Surgery cannot be reduced to a daily target
Sterilisation is not a production-line procedure.
Every animal needs appropriate anaesthesia, pain management, sterile surgery and post-operative recovery. When those stages are rushed, the consequences can be severe.
Recent reports from Hosur illustrate the risk.
In March 2026, animal activists alleged that a female dog was about to be released after sterilisation with her intestines protruding following what they described as a botched procedure.
Hosur civic officials said the dog was readmitted and that action was being taken against the NGO involved.
The Krishnagiri Regional Joint Director of Animal Husbandry said the organisation would not continue ABC activity in the district after a report was sent to the Animal Welfare Board of India.
In Pollachi, an animal-welfare official cited in the September investigation alleged that a female dog died from post-operative evisceration at a centre where the recovery unit was located around two kilometres from the surgical facility.
In Mannargudi, the same investigation reported another female dog found alive with severe post-surgical wound failure.
These cases are not proof that every ABC centre is unsafe, but they show why post-operative care cannot be treated as a box to tick.
Contractor oversight is emerging as a major weakness
The contractor system raises another serious question.
In March, the Tamil Nadu Animal Welfare Board wrote seeking action against the NGO Prani Mithran, citing 17 formal complaints between January 2023 and January 2026.
The complaints alleged improperly conducted surgeries, mutilation, gross negligence in post-operative care and multiple animal deaths.
Inspection reports also alleged that officials were obstructed when they attempted to inspect the facility.
The organisation challenged government action in the Madras High Court. In June 2026, the court dismissed its petition and imposed costs, noting the serious complaints and the need to submit to inspection.
Separately, reporting showed that concerns surrounding the NGO had surfaced in both Hosur and Tiruppur.
The broader investigative report further alleged that organisations blacklisted or removed in one jurisdiction were sometimes still able to find work elsewhere.
That exposes a weakness in decentralised contracting: a municipality may know the available bidder without having a real-time picture of the organisation’s record elsewhere.
An ABC programme without rabies vaccination is only half a programme
Sterilisation receives most public attention, but the “ARV” in ABC-ARV is equally important.
The AWBI’s revised module says every dog passing through ABC should receive anti-rabies vaccination, with cold chains maintained and refrigerator power backup available.
That matters because vaccines are temperature-sensitive.
The September investigation reported concerns from activists that some centres did not have reliable refrigeration.
A veterinarian who had previously worked at the Hosur programme alleged that anti-rabies vaccines were not administered during his time there because the refrigerator was unreliable, there were power cuts, there was no generator and fresh vaccine supplies were unavailable.
The NGO involved disputed responsibility, saying cold-chain facilities were provided and inspected by the corporation.
That disagreement shows why independent vaccine records and temperature logs matter. If vaccination cannot be verified, the programme risks failing one of its core public-health purposes.
Counting surgeries is not the same as measuring success
The central policy problem is a familiar one: governments often measure what is easiest to count.
“Dogs sterilised” is an easy number to report and link to targets or payment. But it says little about whether the dog survived surgery, received effective vaccination, recovered properly or returned to the correct territory.
A stronger system would follow outcomes rather than raw throughput, using verified animal identification, timestamped capture and release records, surgery records, vaccine batches, cold-chain logs, mortality reporting and random inspections.
Technology cannot replace good veterinary practice, but it can make poor practice harder to hide inside a spreadsheet.
Blacklisting must mean something
The same principle applies to contractors.
If an organisation is suspended, blacklisted or faces serious documented findings in one local body, that information should be immediately visible to every other municipality considering a contract.
A central compliance database could show recognition status, inspection results, complaints, suspensions and legal proceedings before contracts are awarded. Without that, “blacklisted” risks becoming a local label rather than a real barrier to re-entry.
The ABC Rules already require AWBI recognition. Compliance status should also follow contractors across municipal boundaries.
ABC remains necessary — but cruelty cannot be its price
None of these failures makes humane dog-population management unnecessary. Ineffective ABC allows populations to rebound, weakens rabies control and damages public trust.
The answer is not to abandon ABC, but to stop treating it as a race for monthly numbers.
The Oulgaret allegations, the Hosur complaints, the Tiruppur regulatory action and reports from other centres all point towards the same lesson.
A sterilised dog is not a successful “unit” merely because it appears in a contractor’s tally.
Success means the right dog was caught humanely, examined properly, operated on safely, given pain relief and post-operative care, vaccinated with a viable anti-rabies vaccine, monitored through recovery and returned healthy to the correct location.
Anything less is not an outcome.
It is only a count.
And when the count becomes more important than the animal, population control can begin to look dangerously like assembly-line cruelty.
Pets News Network is India’s first dedicated media platform for the pet and animal industry. For breaking global pet news, brand coverage, and advertising enquiries, contact: info@petsnewsnetwork.com
